...at least so far. Two quick things:
Update: Okay, one more word from a comment on a recent entry from Steve Clemons:
I'm still mystified that neither Kerry nor Edwards brings up the fact Bush threatened to veto the $87 billion "for the troops"? Cheney's hitting on consistency and all Edwards had to do was say something like "You mean the same consistent approach that led you to threaten to veto the bill because we wanted to pay for it while you wanted my grandchildren to pay for it?" Otherwise I think Edwards did fine, but I agree with Steve that it should have been more of a referendum on Bush.